Tel Aviv – Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon, originally planned to be completed within 60 days, will now take more time, according to an announcement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office on Thursday.
The withdrawal marks the conclusion of Israel’s long-standing military presence in southern Lebanon, an issue that has fueled regional tensions for decades. Officials from Netanyahu’s office attributed the delay to logistical and security challenges, emphasizing the importance of a carefully managed exit.
“The process requires meticulous planning to ensure the safety of Israeli troops and to avoid any instability that might arise in the region,” a senior government official stated, speaking off the record.
Israel’s military presence in southern Lebanon dates back to the 1982 Lebanon War. Over the years, the occupation has been justified by Israeli leaders as a measure to safeguard the northern border from potential attacks by Hezbollah. However, this stance has faced increasing criticism, both domestically and internationally, with many calling for an immediate end to the occupation.
Mixed Reactions to the Delay
The extended timeline has drawn sharp reactions from stakeholders on both sides of the border. Lebanese officials have condemned the delay, asserting that Israel’s continued presence violates Lebanese sovereignty and international law.
“Israel must respect its commitments and withdraw without further postponement,” said a spokesperson for the Lebanese government. “Delaying this process only deepens mistrust and tension.”
Within Israel, the decision has sparked a debate. Some critics argue that a hasty withdrawal could jeopardize national security, particularly given the threat posed by Hezbollah. “We support ending the occupation, but it must be done in a way that does not compromise the safety of our citizens,” said an opposition lawmaker in the Knesset.
Regional and International Implications
As Israel prepares to dismantle its military infrastructure in southern Lebanon, the situation remains volatile. The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), tasked with maintaining peace in the area, is expected to take on a larger role during and after the withdrawal.
Analysts caution that the delay could exacerbate tensions between Israel and Lebanon, potentially complicating future peace efforts. “This is not just about logistics; it’s about trust and stability in an already fragile region,” noted a regional affairs expert.
Commitment to Withdrawal
Despite the delay, Netanyahu’s office reiterated Israel’s commitment to completing the withdrawal. “This is a complex and sensitive operation, but it remains a priority for the government,” the official statement read.
The international community is closely monitoring the situation, with hopes that the withdrawal will open doors to renewed dialogue and cooperation in the Middle East. For now, both Israel and Lebanon face critical decisions that will shape the region’s future trajectory.
Author: Hassan Ahmad
