In a major policy development, the United States has issued a “cease activities” order on all ongoing foreign aid programs and paused new assistance, as part of a 90-day comprehensive review of foreign aid initiated by President Donald Trump. This decision, outlined in a Department of State memorandum, has drawn significant global attention and sparked concerns about its potential implications.
The memorandum, obtained through reliable sources, highlights exceptions for military financing to Israel and Egypt. However, it remains silent on other nations, raising alarms among lawmakers and international partners who fear that the move may drive some U.S. allies to seek support from rival powers.
Humanitarian and Development Impacts
An anonymous official from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) revealed that the freeze has already affected key projects in Ukraine, particularly in the health and education sectors. This disruption could hinder the delivery of critical services to vulnerable populations. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been tasked with overseeing the review process over the next 85 days.
Although some emergency aid, such as food assistance, will continue—especially in regions facing acute crises like Gaza—aid groups warn of dire consequences elsewhere. Jan Egeland, Secretary-General of the Norwegian Refugee Council, described the pause as “disastrous” for Afghanistan. He warned that the halt in aid could exacerbate the suffering of millions, particularly women and children, who depend on international support for survival.
A Shift in U.S. Foreign Policy?
This suspension follows an executive order issued by President Trump, calling for an evaluation of how foreign aid aligns with U.S. foreign policy objectives. With U.S. foreign assistance amounting to approximately $70.3 billion annually, the review signals a potential shift in priorities. Aid to United Nations agencies and international development programs may also come under scrutiny, creating uncertainty for global humanitarian initiatives.
The decision has prompted widespread criticism from aid organizations and foreign policy experts. They argue that the pause undermines the U.S.’s commitment to addressing global challenges and could weaken its diplomatic standing.
Global Implications
As the international community watches closely, the freeze in U.S. foreign aid could have far-reaching consequences for both humanitarian efforts and geopolitical dynamics. Many nations reliant on U.S. assistance may seek alternative partnerships, reshaping alliances and influencing global power structures.
While the review aims to align aid programs with national interests, critics contend that it risks jeopardizing essential projects and undermining America’s role as a global leader in development and humanitarian relief.
Conclusion
The coming months will reveal the full impact of this decision as the U.S. undertakes its 90-day review. For now, the halt in foreign aid has cast a shadow over vital international programs, leaving millions at risk and raising questions about the future of U.S. foreign assistance.
Author: Hassan Ahmad
